Friday, December 18, 2009

Final Paper

Brett Cowley

Christine Allen

Writing 2010

9 December 2009

The War at Home

The United States is one of the major super powers of the world. We have the troops and the weapons, but what happened during the Vietnam War? The war started many years before the United States ever got involved. It started with The French who had colonized Vietnam in the 1800’s. In 1954 the Vietnam nation split into two, North and South Vietnam (Rosenberg). North Vietnam was backed by the Soviet Union and the Communist rule, while the South was backed by the United States, the Democrat party (Rosenberg). The United States wanted to enforce the Truman Doctrine, which states that the United States will support Democracy worldwide and fight against communist rule. The United States entered Vietnam August 2, 1965 (Rosenberg). Now at this time, the United States was already funding the South Vietnamese and sent over military advisers. The war continued and as more and more U.S. troops died, the more and more people at home got upset and started speaking out. They started seeing murder and horrible atrocities towards the Vietnamese people as well. The real fight for America was the war at home. The Vietnamese knew if they were able to hold in long enough they could prevail. The U.S. kept its involvement in the war until January 23, 1973 when the last American troop came home (Rosenberg). The fighting continued in Vietnam until 1975 when Vietnam was reunited under communist rule (Rosenberg). The North Vietnamese held strong and won the war. The war at home was a key reason for the loss of the war. Protests, civil disobediences and open objections to the Vietnam War, split the nation in tow and the Revolution began.
When the U.S. entered the war in 1965, there was an abundance of objections as thousands of troops entered the Vietnam Jungles. There were huge protests on University campuses. One school that really stood out and strongly objected the war was UC Berkeley. The students were part of many sit-ins and other huge protests that consisted of thousands of Berkeley students. As the years went on, the demonstrations grew more and more violent, resulting in hundreds of arrests. But as the years continued, less and less students took part in the demonstrations (http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/calhistory/60s.html).
The University of California was not the only school to object to war. Universities all over the country were too, such as universities in Oklahoma. Protests grew dramatically on Oklahoma universities in 1964 when the military had a heavy movement into Vietnam (Miller). The government and FBI during this time radically tried to stop these demonstrations. In 1970 there was a huge increase in war protests in Oklahoma when President Nixon moved troops into Cambodia. Thousands of students protested to boycott classes at the University of Oklahoma. Now Oklahoma was not the only place in the United States to protest strongly against the Vietnam War. California also had strong protests, especially at the University of California Berkley. There was also a strong movement in San Francisco by the hippies. The protests ceased in March of 1973 when the final American troops came home (Miller).
While college students around the country were protesting, there were many other groups of individuals, doing their part, the hippies. Fred Stern writes, “They were symbolized by the flower children.” The hippie movement revolved around the idea of peace. This inspiration of peace greatly came from the use of drugs such as marijuana and LSD. The hippies were commonly thought of as dirty and really poor. They lived in the city of San Francisco, right next to the University of California. Hippies had a wide variety of expressing their views through songs, protests, writings, and many other ways. Stern also says that one of the main events that describes the hippies is Woodstock. Woodstock was a huge music festival that lasted from August 15 to August 18, 1969. It featured many of the big bands from the day such as The Who, Jefferson Airplane, Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin. At the festival over six hundred thousand people attended to express their views on the war, open mindedness, and their creativity. As Fred Stern wrote, “Today the influence of …the Hippies remains an undeniable part of our landscape, affecting our thinking and our creative perception.”
In addition to all the protests by hippies and college students, the troops were another major part in the war at home. When the U.S. troops first invaded, they were very affective. They also did not have a problem fighting in the war, but as the war continued in to the late 60’s the troops became more frustrated and less supportive of what they were doing. The 101st airborne division was very affective.
There are many movies about the Vietnam War, that depicts many different views on the war and show different emotions that the troops felt. Certain movies that come straight to mind about the Vietnam War are Platoon, We Were Soldiers, and even American Gangster. Platoon was a movie based on the later years of the war. The soldiers were depicted as dying all over the place and it really showed the fear and lack of commitment that the military men had. One of the scenes in the movie was based on an extremely important, vulgar part of the Vietnam War. The instance was My Li. At My Li the U.S. troops ransacked a village, brutally murdering many innocent people, while also tortured the people there. This was extremely bad, but one good thing that came of this instance was, a helicopter operator that was flying over the village, landed his chopper, had his machine gunners point their guns at our own troops and said if they continued this brutality they would open fire. His name was Captain Hugh Thompson and his crew was later awarded medals for their bravery to stand up to their own side. This was the major massacre that had leaked out but it was not the only case of these horrifying atrocities. Sir, No Sir over exaggerated the amounts of the instances. I am not saying they did not happen, but they did not happen at the alarming rate the documentary depicted.
Another movie that depicted the terrible things the troops were doing was American Gangster. In this film, it showed the corruption in the military, as they were the ones shipping heroin into America, were Frank Lucas, one of America’s biggest drug dealer, was getting his product.
We Were Soldiers is a completely different movie, which portrays the war a completely different way. There is a good reason for this too. At this time, it was very early in the war. The battle that took place was not fought in villages or in the heavily covered jungles that were later fought in. This battle was very important to both sides, because the North Vietnamese and the United States were testing each other out, seeing how to fight one another (Gallows). At the battle the U.S. whipped out an entire battalion of North Vietnamese (Gallows). After this catastrophic loss for the Vietnamese they new they could not stand a chance fighting a war toe to toe with the United States, and receded to fighting in the jungles (Gallows).
As the war moved on, more and more troops were dying, not knowing why. They had lost all motivation, partially due to drug usage at the time. Another huge factor was the South Vietnamese were doing nothing. The troops did not see why they had to fight while the South did not help at all. This was extremely frustrating and one main reason for the their loss of motivation.
Many troops had now refused to fight and were going to jail for it. Keith Mather was one of those individuals. He and a group of soldiers chained themselves up to ministers in a church. It took the United States government three days to finally figure out how to deal with this problem. They refused their orders and decided to not go to Vietnam. They spent a few years in prison for their actions. This action was called The Nine For Peace (Sir, No Sir). Another alternative to getting drafted or opposing their orders, was Canada. Some Americans left the United States in fear of the draft or just because they wanted to avoid going to Vietnam. These people were known as conscientious objectors. Now as people refused to go and people left to Canada, there was still a considerable amount of people who wanted to go to Vietnam, thinking it was their duty to their country. A lot of the people that did this were military students from West Point who wanted combat experience so they could get higher in the rankings for their military careers.
The war continued and more and more G.I.’s were opposing their duties. Some came back from Vietnam and would tell the new recruits what was happening. The main place for these casual meetings was in coffee houses, were soldiers and antiwar members were free to gather and express their opinions and enjoy each other’s company. These coffee houses did not support the use of drugs and forbid them in the shops. Another thing that arouse from these coffee houses were underground newspapers that would spread propaganda against the war (Sir, No Sir).
Towards the end of the war, troops openly refused to fight in battle and would not leave on their patrols. One way they made their points clear, were the fraggings. This was where troops would attack their officers with fragmentation grenades. The troops would throw these grenades into the tents of the officers at night while they were sleeping.
There were many different anti-war parties that would spread propaganda through meetings, interviews, the newspapers and coffee houses. One of the major antiwar groups was FTA, which stands for Fuck The Army. This had a very derogatory meaning and showed the complete lack of support for a military that protects a great country. This slogan was derived from the army’s own slogan, Fun Travel and Adventure. This was the G.I. movements strongest group, which obtained many supporters outside the army, such as Jane Fonda (Sir, No Sir).
Jane Fonda is one of the most controversial and disliked people that were talked about at the time and still to this day. She was an upcoming actress who stepped out and voiced her opinion, at first. She was a strong supporter of FTA, who traveled across the U.S. and spoke out against the army. Fonda and her part of FTA would change the words from Fuck the Army to Free the Army, but truly meant F the Army (Sir, No Sir). Later as she became more and more radical she embarked on a trip to North Vietnam. This is where she became hated and despised by many. She went over there to visit the American POW’s and saw how they were treated. She gave a radio broadcast expressing that the North Vietnamese were treating them humanly and were not torturing them or anything of that nature, but as the troops were let go they revealed how they were really treated and the horrors and degradation they had to endure while being a POW in the hands of the Vietnamese. Outraged Jane call them all, “hypocrites and liars.” At this time period certain individuals thought that Fonda was committing treason, yet the government did not pursue her. Years had passed and she was trying to rebuild her image by rededicating herself to acting and finally in the year 1988 she publically apologized for what she had said by saying she was “thoughtless and careless” (Emery).
Although the country was filled with the antiwar movement, there were those who still supported the war. One large group that supported the Vietnam War, besides the government, was the NAACP or National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The head of the NAACP, Roy Wilkins, was a strong supporter of President Johnson. Glen Inghram wrote about Wilkins support by saying, “Wilkins also believed that the increasing role of young African-American males in Vietnam would further legitimize their overall stature within American society, a view also held by prominent leaders including Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara and Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan.” The NAACP was not the only ones to support the war. Others include Bob Hope, a comedian who was sent to Vietnam to entertain the troops. Others supporters were those of the older generations.
Besides the support little support in the United States, Australia also was a supporter of the South Vietnamese, sending around two hundred thousand troops and thirty military advisers to the country. They were to serve alongside the U.S. 173rd Airborne Brigade. Australia stayed in the war just as long as the United States did, withdrawing most of the troops in 1973 (http://www.awm.gov.au/atwar/vietnam.asp).
Never has this country been more unsupportive for a war. Troops were demoralized, both by what they were doing themselves and how they were treated at home. The anti-war movement for the Vietnam War had a tremendous impact on the military. Protests were rampant throughout the country, from colleges to the hippies, spreading to the U.S. veterans themselves and anti-war groups such as FTA, and supporters like Jane Fonda, started a revolution that will never be forgotten. Vietnam will never be forgotten and the war at home has left a lasting impression that should never be repeated.






Works Cited
Australian War Memorial - Vietnam War 1962–75." Australian War Memorial. N.p., n.d. Web. 7 Dec. 2009. .
Emery, David. "Jane Fonda in Vietnam." 3rd Marines,3rd Marines in Vietnam, USMC Vietnam Veterans, Vietnam Vets,USMC Award Certificates,Replacement award certificates. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Dec. 2009. .
Galloway, Joseph L., and Harold G. Moore. We were Soldiers Once...And Young: Ia Drang--The Battle That Changed The War In Vietnam. 1 ed. New York: Random House, 1992. Print.
Inghram, Glen. "NAACP SUPPORT OF THE VIETNAM WAR: 1963-1969." Western Journal of Black Studies 2006 30.1 (2006): 54-61. Military & Government Collection. Web. 5 Dec. 2009.
"Days of Cal | Berkeley in the 60s." Berkeley Digital Library SunSITE. University of California, n.d. Web. 6 Dec. 2009. .
Miller, John W.. "VIETNAM WAR PROTESTS." Oklahoma State University - Stillwater - Home. Oklahoma Historical Society, n.d. Web. 1 Dec. 2009. .
Rosenberg, Jennifer. "Vietnam War - A History of the Vietnam War." 20th Century History. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Dec. 2009. .
Stern, Fred. "Bookmarkable URL intermediate page." EBSCOhost. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Dec. 2009. .
American Gangster (Two-Disc Collector's Edition). Dir. Harris Savides. Perf. Denzel Washington, Russell Crowe, Chiwetel Ejiofor. Universal Studios, 2007. DVD.
Platoon (Special Edition). Dir. Oliver Stone. Perf. Keith David Forest Whitaker Francesco Quinn Kevin Dillon John C. McGinley. Mgm (Video &Amp; Dvd), 1986. DVD.
Sir! No Sir! - The Suppressed Story of the GI Movement to End the War in Vietnam. Dir. David Zeiger. Perf. Louis Font, Hal Muskat, Susan Schnall. Docurama, 2005. DVD.
We Were Soldiers (Widescreen Edition). Dir. Randall Wallace. Perf. Mel Gibson. Paramount, 2002. DVD.

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Rhetorical Analysis

Rhetorical Analysis

War has always been a terrible thing with death and worry everywhere. I was watching Saving Private Ryan the other day and I realized how scary it would be to actually be on the front lines. War is such a scary thing, especially when it is against your own side; such is the case with women soldiers in the military today. “The Private War of Women Soldiers” is an article written by Helen Benedict that describes such stories and fears that our women soldiers face today. Helen is a very one sided writer that is difficult to see her side on with some issues and other issues that need to be discussed.
Benedicts article is about the rape and sexual harassment that women soldiers in the United States military have to deal with. The article is written with interviews of twenty women soldiers and their stories and situations that they have to deal with. She writes her paper with a very one-sided point of view. While the women’s’ arguments are great, they are completely one sided and there is not one point from the other side of the story, or the men’s view.
The way Benedict puts out her information in her article is what makes others disagree with her. She is extremely liberal and opposed to war. Her opening sentence says, “As thousands of burned-out soldiers prepare to return to Iraq to fill President Bush’s unwelcome call for at least 20,000 more troops, I cant help wondering what the women among those troops will have to face.” This line is filled with negative words, attacking President Bush and the war, showing her true feelings of the war.
Another aspect that others would feel is an unfair is the people she interviews and how she interviews them. She interviewed twenty women who all have their separate accounts of rape and sexual harassment. This is not a bad thing but it is very close-minded and does not portray both sides of the story. If she interviews men then she will get both sides of the story. Also if she does that then she will have more people listening to her and more open to what she has to say. One thing that could be done is interview more women, women that have not had any problems with these issues. Also if she interviewed men in the military it would help her case even more. How she could interview them is just by asking questions on how the men feel about the women being in the armed forces. There are many things that Benedict can do to prove her argument better and get more people to fully listen to her stance.
She should get interviews from officers who do protect women and see how they handle such cases. Helen needs to open up and be less one-sided herself. When she gets some of her statistics, she is very vague, making people who are less knowledge able think things are extremely bad. When she states, “…450 women have been wounded in Iraq, and 71 have died—more female casualties and deaths than in Korean, Vietnam and first Gulf Wars combined” it leads people to think that there was a huge amount of women in each and everyone of those wars, which there wasn’t. She is completely basing her paper on one-sided facts when she really needs to open and broaden the article.
Helen may have presented her issue wrong but I do feel she has touched on a very important issue. Rape in the military is nothing to be over looked and is a bigger issue than most people realize. The last thing that any person joining the military should have to worry about is rape, whether being a guy or a girl. It does happen to both.
When Benedict quotes Jennifer Spranger saying, “My team leader offered me up to $250 for a hand job. He would always make sure that we were out alone together at the beginning and he wouldn’t stop pressuring me for sex,” it truly clarifies that this is happening and even officers are pressuring soldiers for it. Benedict continues to show and give numerous accounts of women that have been sexually harassed or raped. She continues by adding that there are problems with reporting it and that there is no help for these women. After discussing this article with numerous people, especially my friends who are currently serving in the armed forces, they said that they have not seen a problem with this. Another person that I asked about this said they handle these cases way differently then Benedict reports.
After discussing the actual consequences with people that have dealt with this they said that both people are transferred immediately the next day. Benedict does not report this at all, in fact she quotes Spranger again saying, “You rat somebody out, you’re screwed. You’re gonna be a loner until they eventually push you out.” By stating it this way, she gives no information if she was transferred or even if she reported it.
After reading this article and having little knowledge of what actually happens I feel there does need to be a real change in dealing with rape and sexual harassment in the military. I feel women should actually have a place where they can go and report this instead of having to make things so public. Clearly women do not have a secure website to report this, so I think the Department of Defense needs to work on that. The last thing anyone needs in the military is worrying about rape, there is already death around every corner. Another way that this issue can be dealt with is, a buddy system. Women should be required to have a buddy, a female, that goes with them everywhere so they don’t have to worry about taking a shower or going out for water at night.
This is a terrible thing that needs to be dealt with. Now the Department of Defense of is trying to help but they seem to not be getting anywhere. I feel Benedict is a terrible writer who does not know how to address an audience, especially if she would like conservative people to listen to what she has to say. Only interviewing twenty women is getting one side of a story that is a lot bigger of issue that deserves both sides. Whether I agree with Helen or not, she did touch on a vital issue and it does need to be dealt with. War is a terrible thing especially when you have to fight off your own team.

Iraq In Fragments

Iraq In Fragments

The United States entered Iraq to help liberate them from oppression Saddam Hussein. The reasons for enter Iraq was for the threat of chemical weapons that they may have. The questions have been stirring, is that what we are there for? Certain people who oppress the war say it is for the oil or so President George W. Bush can finish what his father started. The questions can be answered only through the eyes of congress and our past President. The government can dictate what it wants the people to know, very well. A real way to see if we should help the individuals who live in Iraq and were oppressed by Saddam, is to go into their land and see their lives.
Iraqis has many different opinions of the United States being in their homeland. There has obviously been oppression from the rule of Saddam Hussein. People have not been able to speak out against him and if it happened there were numerous punishments from it, such as being imprisoned, tortured, or even shot and killed. Muhammad, a child who lives in Iraq, states about his father being imprisoned, “My father was a Lieutenant, ten a policeman. One day he started talking about Saddam, then they put him in prison.” This should be more of a reason for the United States to get involved and help release these individuals. Freedom of speech and religion were the most important idea’s of our country and because of that our founding fathers put it as the first amendment. The counter argument for this would be, if the Iraqis wanted to get rid of the oppression they would themselves, that we should not lose American lives to better these individuals.
While watching the video, “Iraq In Fragments”, we see that there were both sides of this argument even in their society. Muhammad’s employer in the beginning of the movie stated that he felt the times were better while Saddam was in power. He wished for him to be back. As the film continued, they entered a Muslim temple and they were singing praises of Saddam’s oppression being gone, saying, “Be gone oppression… from Saddam.” So the real question occurs, what should we as America do?
The movie continues and shows us how bad things in Iraq are. Muhammad is in the age range of eight to ten years old. The movie starts by showing us his job and how his employer is abusive and brain washes the young child. We see this when he says, “look at me you scum!” and Muhammad replies to the interviewer by saying, “He loves me like a son.” Muhammad states his reason for working as, “I started working to support my grandmother and mother.” An eight-year-old boy should not be put into this situation.
As the movie continued we saw the young child attending school. He was held back three times, because he dropped out of school to work and support his family. Muhammad was asked to spell his name and his fathers name and he couldn’t spell his fathers name and his employer verbally abused him. Then Muhammad left his work there to work for his uncle. Muhammad was so glad to be out of that situation and we know this when he says, “I would rather kill myself then go back.” This brings up a great argument that the United States needs to intervene to not only help them from Saddam but so that children can have the opportunity to attend school and not have to worry about an angry employer who is only looking out for the money.
The movie is able to address many different audiences and able to address many questions about the situation that the people that live there have to deal with. People should not be forced to live in fear from a dictator or even their employer. I feel we should have done what we did. Now that the country is liberated we should move our troops out and put in more humanitarian aid.

Interview with Grandpa

Interview With My Grandfather

For my interview, I decided to conduct in on my grandfather, who served in the Korean War. These were my questions and answers that I received.

1. Why were we there?
The United States was there to help South Korea from being invaded. We entered, because North Korea wanted to capture South Korea’s capital. They almost accomplished it, but they held strong and were able to start pushing the North Korean. Marine core went in next because the first wave of troops was soft. Being ill trained and not experienced. The main reason was to make sure that South Korea did not fall to the communists.

2. What was your duty and did you participate in combat?
He was part of Task force 77. It was very instrumental in fighting off the North Koreans. It was a naval ship that was off the coast of Korea. They had aircrafts that were sent to bomb North Korea. It was very effective.
No he did not participate in combat. He was just off the coast of Korea.

3. What was it like living in Korea?
He lived a couple of miles off the coast. He served during the winter so it was icy and cold. He said that it took a lot of perseverance to push through the cold winter.

4. How did the war affect you mentally?
Didn’t affect him at all. The ship lost some airplanes. He said that he felt that no one on the ship had any either. He has had no PTSD.

5. What was the hardest thing for you to do during the war?
Being away from home and the U.S. Spending the winter out at sea with storms. Lonesomeness for his family and U.S. were the toughest things he had to deal with.

Letter To Obama

Letter to Obama

Dear Mr. President,
In your days in office, there are many pressing issues that need to be addressed. I am sure you struggle with many tough decisions about the economy everyday. This is an important issue but you must never forget our troops. I am not implying that you are, I just am bringing the issue to you. IAVA has two issues that I feel are incredible important about our troops. First would be the Prioritizing the veterans in the economic stimulus package. I feel the people who deserve the money that you promised America, would be our troops who fight to defend this great Nation. The second issue I think IAVA makes a great point on is the aggressive address to our troops’ mental health injuries. I think some of our troops have either had extremely rough experiences in the armed forces and they need to be heard by someone who cares. I also would like to stress how it is important that they come to us, instead of making every troop have to deal with counseling that they may not have to deal with. I feel the military and citizens are pushing for every troop and making them feel bad for what they have done so they suffer from PTSD. This is not the case for everyone and should be handled very carefully. Thank you for hearing the words that I have to say and I hope you take them into consideration.

Sincerely,
Brett Cowley

Profile

There were many different anti-war parties that would spread propaganda through meetings, interviews, the newspapers and coffee houses. One of the major antiwar groups was FTA, which stands for Fuck The Army. This had a very derogatory meaning and showed the complete lack of support for a military that protects a great country. This slogan was derived from the army’s own slogan, Fun Travel and Adventure. This was the G.I. movements strongest group, which obtained many supporters outside the army, such as Jane Fonda.
Jane Fonda is one of the most controversial and disliked people that were talked about at the time and still to this day. She was an upcoming actress who stepped out and voiced her opinion, at first. As she became more and more radical she embarked on a trip to North Vietnam. This is where she became hated and despised by many. She went over there to visit the American POW’s and saw how they were treated. She gave a radio broadcast expressing that the North Vietnamese were treating them humanly and were not torturing them or anything of that nature, but as the troops were let go they revealed how they were really treated and the horrors and degradation they had to endure while being a POW in the hands of the Vietnamese. Outraged Jane call them all, “hypocrites and liars.” At this time period certain individuals thought that Fonda was committing treason, yet the government did not pursue her. Years had passed and she was trying to rebuild her image by rededicating herself to acting and finally in the year 1988 she publically apologized for what she had said by saying she was “thoughtless and careless.”